Ethik und die olympischen Spiele in China (German)
Posted on Friday, 18 April, 2008
English Summary: While for a long time, because of my hostility to the Chinese regime along with my free-market ideals, I have often been branded a "cold warrior" or die-hard capitalist, mainstream opinion has again grown more sceptical of China as, in the build-up to the Olympic Games, its oppression of the Tibetan people has returned to the limelight. In this article, I explain how I believe globalization and free markets enable the average consumer to exert a great deal of pressure directly on the regime. Olympic Sponsors such as Coca-Cola, McDonald's or Omega that pay a fortune in order to be associated with a murderous regime that still venerates Mao, a tyrant responsible for the deaths of far more people than Hitler and Stalin combined, should get what they paid for: the utter disgust and condemnation of the free world. Come on, people, there's Pepsi, Red Bull, there's Burger King, there are dozens of quality watch makers. There are other consumer electronics makers than Samsung or Panasonic and other credit cards than Visa. There is really no reason - and no excuse - for us Western consumers if they were to chose to become accomplices to mass murder, oppression, torture and numerous other human rights abuses by buying the products of any sponsor of the Olympic Games.
Categories: Free Thought, Free Markets
Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Back to the top of this page
